Live Chat
Online

Education Policy

The issue of the separation of church from the state affects the education sector. There have been many cases of students being banned from holding religious meetings. Most of the meetings that were banned were Christian in nature (Sperry, 2014). The main issue that this section shall tackle is whether Christian students should be allowed using school facilities to hold their religious meetings or these meetings should be banned on grounds that it is a violation of the First Amendment. Another issue is whether they should force other students into these meetings in case Christian children are allowed to hold these meetings.

 

May

Biblical Guidelines and Principles

Monsma (2008) observes that the schools that forbid religious meetings, especially Christian meetings, allow other secular clubs to hold meetings that have the same aims are discriminating on religious grounds. The reason for this discrimination is the fact that schools will allow those with a secular view to hold their meetings, while denying the same privilege to those with religious inclinations. On the other hand, there are schools and institutions that force all the students to take place in the schools prayers and other religious activities. Some of these activities include public recital of prayers and reading of the Bible.

Monsma (2008) argues that students should not be forced to participate in public religious activities. First, such a practice would be against the Biblical principles that are stipulated in scripture. He argues that such a mode of action would promote injustice (Monsma, 2008). For instance, forcing all students to participate in Christian activities at school would put the children of non-believers and religious minorities at a disadvantage. Scripture exhorts the believers to uphold justice at all times.

Constitutional Guidelines for Federal and State Involvement

Both the Federal and State governments recognize the First Amendment as an indispensable part of the law that should govern all religious activities. The First Amendment gives all people the freedom of conscience and asserts that all people are free to practice their own religion (Pirner, L?hnemann, & Bielefeldt, 2016). Therefore, all students have the right to hold religious meetings in their school and no student should be forced to participate in a religious activity against their will.

Can

Political Feasibility

This bill has the chance of passing through the House of Commons and the Senate and receive presidential assent. First, it corresponds to all constitutional parameters; therefore, Congress has nothing against the bill. Secondly, the bill does not threaten the security of the nation in any way.

Financial Feasibility

The implementation of this bill will require very little money. The only money that may be needed is the money to sustain the bill in Congress. After this stage, almost no money will be needed to implement this bill into law. The main activity that may require funds in the implementation of this bill is the publicizing of the contents of this bill to schools and other learning institutions in the country.

Practical Feasibility

Image background
Go to our website
Image background
Choose a type of paper you need
Image background
Indicate additional requirements for your essay
Image background
Pay for the order
Image background
Get your flawless paper on time

This bill is very practical. It is applicable in all the education institutions in the country. First, it does not contradict any constitutional demands on religious matters. Secondly, the citizens of the country are likely to support this bill. The notion of freedom of conscience and religion is deeply entrenched in the American social consciousness. Therefore, the bill will be accepted as part of the American culture.

Should

This bill should be passed because it upholds the First Amendment. The bill should have provisions against students being forced to participate in any religious practices against their conscience. The bill should also ban any religious practice in schools from being made public and compulsory for all students. This bill should also be debated upon so that other areas that might have been left out could be added onto the bill for it to have an impact in the public schools. Through the debate in Congress, the bill can achieve this status.

Environmental/Energy Policy

In 2012, the Obama Administration finalized regulations on vehicle fuel efficiency. This policy sets a target of 54.5 miles per gallon for all light trucks and cars with 2025 as the deadline (Kraft & Furlong, 2012). This is considered the most important action set by the government of the United States to reduce greenhouse emissions.

May

Biblical Guidelines and Principles

First, the government should not act as the final authority in this matter. The final source of authority is God (Fischer, 2013). In fact, God did not leave the world and its affairs after he had completed the creation of the earth. Even today, God still claims the earth as his own. In Psalm 50:12, God declares that the earth belongs to the Lord and all that is in it. This statement is echoed in Job 41:11, where God declares that everything under heaven belongs to God. As a result, the policies must be in accordance with the will of God. In addition to this, God takes delight in what He created. As a result, mens only duty should be taking good care of Gods creation and falling down in reverence and awe after seeing the magnificence of the Creator (Nayum & Kl?ckner, 2014). The step that the government took in reducing the amount of greenhouse emissions is in line with scriptures. Since humanity is not the Lord of creation but simply a guardian, the activities of men should not be destructive to the environment. This government policy is a giant step towards governments acting as custodians of the environment. Monsma (2008) argues that stewards should not exploit what is under their care and protection. This policy aims to reduce the amount of greenhouse emissions from vehicles. The result of this policy is friendly to the environment, proving that it is line with the Biblical principle and Guidelines on mans role in the natural world.

Constitutional Guidelines for Federal and State Involvement

The federal government should not interfere with the rules that the states have set to govern fuel consumption. The main reason for this is the fact that vehicle fuel consumption does not threaten the union of the states in any way. Therefore, the states should implement the vehicle fuel consumption legislation at their own pace. The state governments should parallel the policies of the federal government, but the states should not be forced into implementing these policies.

Our benefits
  • 300 words/page
  • Papers written from scratch
  • Relevant and up-to-date sources
  • Fully referenced materials
  • Attractive discount system
  • Strict confidentiality
  • 24/7 customer support

Can

Political Feasibility

This bill can face opposition from various parties, especially the parties that have a vested interest in the sales of vehicles and fuel. For instance, many car manufacturers may find that the implementation of this bill could have a toll on their sales of cars and small trucks. As a result, they may use their connections in Congress to thwart the bill in its infancy stages. Secondly, dealers in fuel may feel that this bill could reduce their profits because it is aimed at reducing fuel consumption in cars. As a result, they may gang up with some senators to block the bill from completion. As a result, the political feasibility of this bill is on the lower margin.

Financial Feasibility

From a financial perspective, the implementation of this bill may require a significant amount of money. First, vehicle manufacturers will need to invest money into the research for better and more efficient cars that consume less fuel (Marks, 2012). On the same note, the increased cost of production may mean that the prices of these efficient vehicles may be slightly higher than those of other vehicles. Based on this, this bill will require money to be implemented.

Practical Feasibility

The bill is very practical because the models of cars that almost meet the regulations specified in the bill have already been produced. These models are more fuel-efficient and they have a less negative impact on the environment. With more research, vehicles matching these standards will be produced. However, this research may take time.

Should

The standards of vehicle fuel consumption should be implemented at the Federal and State levels because they are geared towards protecting the environment. This consumption rate minimizes the rate of emissions from cars and small trucks, thus reducing the negative effects of such emissions on the environment.

Guarantees
Email delivery
Email delivery

Your paper is uploaded to your account and you get a copy delivered by email.

Wide range of services
Wide range of services

Your get wide range of high quality services from our professional team.

Authentic papers
Authentic papers

All papers are written from scratch up to your instructions

Privacy guarantee
Privacy guarantee

No personal data is ever disclosed to any third parties.

Deadline meeting
Deadline meeting

Any paper ordered will be delivered strictly according to the deadline.

Satisfaction guarantee
Satisfaction guarantee

All our customer are totally satisfied with their orders.

No plagiarism
No plagiarism

All papers you order are plagiarism free.

24/7 customer support
24/7 customer support

Our Support Representatives are at your service 24/7 365 days a year.

Free revision
Free revision

Each customer has 48 hours after deadline expires to get paper revised.