Technology has become the center of many sectors of the economy. Now, it is integrated with elections, and, as a result, technology can significantly influence its outcome. Today, the candidates use different technological tools to reach their electorate. The elected president greatly affects technological sector and the culture of the US as well. Through various policies that he or she decides to implement, the head of a state can influence the development of a country either positively or negatively. Apart from it, the elections conducted in one country can have an impact on other nations of the world. This essay describes the impact of technology on a presidential election and defines how a president can influence technology and culture.
A president has a significant impact on the technology of a country, which he or she is leading. Different policies that the head of a state implements determine the direction, in which the tech market moves. First, policies in global trade can influence the way the technological equipment is manufactured. An example can be seen in the intention of the president-elect Donald Trump to move manufacturing industries back to the US from other countries, for example, China (Snavely and Thompson). Such policy imposes huge tariffs on technological equipment made in other countries and can affect the companies relying on these products. On the other hand, the policies encouraging global interdependence can ensure the growth and diversification of the technological sector. It can be done through producing cheaper technological equipment in other countries. As a result, the policies related to global trade that a president chooses can affect the sector mentioned above either positively or negatively.
Another tool that a president can use to influence the technological sector of a country is the immigration policies that he or she decides to adopt. The proposed field relies on innovators from other parts of the world who keep the progress going. Policies that support immigration are appropriate for the improvement of technological sector since foreign innovators can help in enhancing the growth of the industry. However, if the policies limit working visas issuance or immigration in general, they can affect the industry in a negative way. According to Alesina and Ferrera (770), the immigrants can bring special knowledge and experience that the citizens of a particular country may not have or increase the diversity of skills in a certain area. These people can, therefore, possess the abilities that are not accessible locally. Therefore, the immigration policies, which a president applies to the governmental apparatus, can have significant influence on the innovations development. Additionally, a president who is in favor of technology adoption may have positive influence on the advancement of other sectors crucial for state development. For instance, a president can adopt relevant policies. One of them can be observed in the educational sector where he/she is able to ensure that technology is integrated with the educational system, for example, children learn how to use technology as they start going to school. It aids innovation by instilling the children with the know-how of solving any problem through technology. As a result, a president can influence the choice of direction, which a country is taking, when it comes to technology.
Technology has a huge impact on the elections held in a country. One of the ways it influences the latter is by determining social position of a specific candidate. Nowadays, different social networks are used to discuss important issues. It is essential to note that the discussions, which the proposed platforms enabled, have changed the ways through which the candidates interact with their followers. They can develop an influence through these tools and get new followers. Many social networks giving the candidates a channel to interact with their supporters from different areas and of various age groups exist. Another way, in which technology can impact on the elections, is the threat of virality (Cutler). During elections, the lives of the candidates are usually under media scrutiny. New technology has allowed the media to conduct even more thorough investigation. The social networking sites including Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube operate in real time, and anything that the candidates do or say is dissected. The information about their deeds can be uploaded on the Internet and found by anyone. What is more, the actions of their families are also followed closely due to the tools, which technological innovations avail. This scrutiny can result in certain candidates performing better than others and ultimately having a huge impact on the outcome of the elections. The technology affects presidential elections through different data analysis tools. The information from the citizens is collected as well as analyzed; then, the creation of polls begins. From them, a candidate can learn in which areas he/she needs to make improvements to win the elections. The campaigns can, therefore, be more focused on getting the votes of the citizens. Lastly, technology brings newer issues that the candidates can talk about and are required to define own position. Topics like cybersecurity or net neutrality can be used, and each candidate should be given a chance to express his/her opinion on them (Achillias). In addition, the voters can view the candidates who do not support the use of the newer technologies as not serious ones. Technology has now become a part of connection with the citizens and can be attributed to affecting the success of a campaign. From the above viewpoints, it can be seen that technology has a huge impact on the result of elections.
Apart from having significant influence on the technology of a country, a president can also affect its culture. One of the ways of doing it is breaking different norms observed in the state. An example can be seen in the election of Obama as the 45th president of the US. This event changed the culture of the US. Barrack Obama eliminated the stereotype of what the presidents are supposed to be like or how they should conduct themselves (Alford). He broke the belief that a representative of ethnic minority cannot be elected as the president of the US. In addition, the presidents can influence the direction that a country takes politically. George Washington helped to mold the culture of the US in several ways. First, he set the tradition, according to which the presidents had a right to select their cabinets and heads of departments of the government (Miller Center of Public Affairs). What is more, he established the standard for presidents to be elected only for two terms. Consequently, a president can influence the way people think about various issues. He or she can conduct campaigns to sensitize the citizens on different problems; hence, eventually, a president changes their view on a particular thing. By showing people that doing things in an appropriate way results in better life, a president can alter the culture of the said country.
Moreover, presidents can often be considered a reflection of a nation’s culture. They embody the beliefs and values that the citizens have and demonstrate by giving a vote for a specific candidate. Thus, the actions taken by a president and his/her behavior often represents what is acceptable and encourages in a specific society. In addition, a president can make people accept, follow, and respect an innovation within the culture even outside a certain state. For example, before the implementation of the 22nd Amendment of the US constitution, most presidents used to run for two terms in office. It demonstrated the culture of the US to the rest of the world. What is more, the president’s stance on different issues, for instance, gun ownership can be the representation of the traditions that are peculiar to the country. If a president supports the idea that people should freely own guns, it serves as the demonstration of things, to which most of the Americans have accustomed to. Therefore, a president of the US and his/her activity is the reflection of the culture of the country.
Presidential elections in a certain country can have huge impact on other nations of the world. They determine a leader who is going to interact with other heads of the states. It is, therefore, crucial for people to choose the individuals who are suitable for this position and can be able to contact with other world leaders in accordance with the interests of their native countries. The result of elections in a country can impact on other states through the policies that each of the candidates is willing to implement. Trade policies can ensure that a country promotes commercial relations with particular partners while not developing them with other states. Each candidate has his/her own plan of implementing policies, which is usually different from the ones of the rest of the candidates. An example can be seen in the elections of 2016, during which the president-elect Donald Trump focused on bringing the manufacturing industries back to the US (Snavely and Thompson). It will be done through reduced tariffs. The proposed action has to make the US a preferred place for the manufacturing industries. This move means that countries, in which most of the US are manufactured, for example, China, will not have as intensive trade relations with the US as they previously did. In addition, the elections in a country can determine the character of relations that it develops with the rest of the world. CNN presents different viewpoints on the last presidential elections in the US. They are able to change significantly the relations of the United States with different countries. The Iranians hoped for a Democratic president who would continue improving relations between two countries (CNN). In addition, the countries of the Middle East will feel the effect of the election of Donald Trump. Various issues including ISIS among others affect this region of the world, and the countries belonging to it would like to see a candidate who offers leadership and clearly outlined policy for tackling the existing problems. From the above, it is clear that the elections in a single country can impact on the rest of the world in different ways.
In conclusion, technology is one of the issues affecting every country today. A president can influence this sector in the United States. It can be conducted in the form of the policies he or she decides to implement that either cause harm or lead to the development of innovations. The advancement of technology in the country can, in turn, influence the elections. Technology has provided new tools that have redesigned the way the candidates interact with their supporters. In addition, it has also brought serious issues to be discussed during elections. Consequently, the elections in a state can have huge impact on other countries, which depends on the stance that each candidate takes. The culture of a country represents what its citizens are accustomed to. A president has an influence on the culture of a country and, in some cases, can be able to change it. In addition, he/she is a representative of this culture.